[openib-general] Re: [PATCH] kDAPL: remove typedef DAT_CONTEX T
Itamar Rabenstein
Tue May 31 09:16:40 PDT 2005
- Previous message: [openib-general] RE: [PATCH][kdapl] replace spin_lock with spin_lock_irqsave in kd apltest
- Next message: [openib-general] Re: [PATCH] kDAPL: remove typedef DAT_CONTEX T
-
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
hi all,
I have tried to use DAT_UPCALL_NULL and I got compile error
and I don't think that it is good to try to make comparator ( = ) between
structs
if we want to check for DAT_UPCALL_NULL we need to check that the CB
function pointer is NULL.
I mean that if you want to use DAT_UPCALL_NULL you need to have
real dat_upcall struct and to set the CB function to NULL.
instead of casting NULL to be a struct.
Currently dat_evd_modify_upcall() is not implemented according the spec.
Itamar
> -----Original Message-----
> From: James Lentini [mailto:jlentini at netapp.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2005 6:39 PM
> To: Tom Duffy
> Cc: openib-general at openib.org
> Subject: [openib-general] Re: [PATCH] kDAPL: remove typedef
> DAT_CONTEXT
>
>
>
> Mostly committed in revision 2515.
>
> I didn't remove DAT_UPCALL_NULL and DAT_UPCALL_SAME. DAT_UPCALL_NULL
> is provided as a convenience to the consumer. I think it is
> useful, but
> I'm willing to hear other opinions. The provider's implementation of
> dat_evd_modify_upcall() should check for the DAT_UPCALL_SAME value.
> The fact that it doesn't is a bug.
>
> james
>
> On Fri, 27 May 2005, Tom Duffy wrote:
>
> tduffy> Get rid of the typedef DAT_CONTEXT.
> tduffy>
> tduffy> Signed-off-by: Tom Duffy <tduffy at sun.com>
> tduffy>
> tduffy> Index: linux-kernel/test/dapltest/include/dapl_common.h
> tduffy>
> ===================================================================
> tduffy> --- linux-kernel/test/dapltest/include/dapl_common.h
> (revision 2506)
> tduffy> +++ linux-kernel/test/dapltest/include/dapl_common.h
> (working copy)
> tduffy> @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ typedef enum
> tduffy> typedef struct
> tduffy> {
> tduffy> DAT_RMR_CONTEXT rmr_context;
> tduffy> - DAT_CONTEXT mem_address;
> tduffy> + union dat_context mem_address;
> tduffy> } RemoteMemoryInfo;
> tduffy> #pragma pack()
> tduffy>
> tduffy> Index: linux-kernel/dat-provider/dapl_get_consumer_context.c
> tduffy>
> ===================================================================
> tduffy> ---
> linux-kernel/dat-provider/dapl_get_consumer_context.c (revision 2506)
> tduffy> +++
> linux-kernel/dat-provider/dapl_get_consumer_context.c (working copy)
> tduffy> @@ -48,7 +48,7 @@
> tduffy> * DAT_SUCCESS
> tduffy> * DAT_INVALID_PARAMETER
> tduffy> */
> tduffy> -u32 dapl_get_consumer_context(DAT_HANDLE dat_handle,
> DAT_CONTEXT *context)
> tduffy> +u32 dapl_get_consumer_context(DAT_HANDLE dat_handle,
> union dat_context *context)
> tduffy> {
> tduffy> u32 dat_status = DAT_SUCCESS;
> tduffy> struct dapl_header *header;
> tduffy> Index: linux-kernel/dat-provider/dapl_set_consumer_context.c
> tduffy>
> ===================================================================
> tduffy> ---
> linux-kernel/dat-provider/dapl_set_consumer_context.c (revision 2506)
> tduffy> +++
> linux-kernel/dat-provider/dapl_set_consumer_context.c (working copy)
> tduffy> @@ -47,7 +47,7 @@
> tduffy> * DAT_SUCCESS
> tduffy> * DAT_INVALID_HANDLE
> tduffy> */
> tduffy> -u32 dapl_set_consumer_context(DAT_HANDLE dat_handle,
> DAT_CONTEXT context)
> tduffy> +u32 dapl_set_consumer_context(DAT_HANDLE dat_handle,
> union dat_context context)
> tduffy> {
> tduffy> u32 dat_status = DAT_SUCCESS;
> tduffy> struct dapl_header *header;
> tduffy> Index: linux-kernel/dat-provider/dapl.h
> tduffy>
> ===================================================================
> tduffy> --- linux-kernel/dat-provider/dapl.h (revision 2506)
> tduffy> +++ linux-kernel/dat-provider/dapl.h (working copy)
> tduffy> @@ -177,7 +177,7 @@ struct dapl_header {
> tduffy> enum dat_handle_type handle_type;
> tduffy> struct dapl_ia *owner_ia;
> tduffy> struct dapl_llist_entry ia_list_entry;
> tduffy> - DAT_CONTEXT user_context; /* user
> context - opaque to DAPL */
> tduffy> + union dat_context user_context; /* user
> context - opaque to DAPL */
> tduffy> spinlock_t lock;
> tduffy> unsigned long flags; /* saved lock
> flag values */
> tduffy> };
> tduffy> @@ -423,9 +423,11 @@ extern u32 dapl_ia_query(DAT_IA_HANDLE,
> tduffy>
> tduffy> /* helper functions */
> tduffy>
> tduffy> -extern u32 dapl_set_consumer_context(DAT_HANDLE
> handle, DAT_CONTEXT context);
> tduffy> +extern u32 dapl_set_consumer_context(DAT_HANDLE handle,
> tduffy> + union dat_context context);
> tduffy>
> tduffy> -extern u32 dapl_get_consumer_context(DAT_HANDLE
> handle, DAT_CONTEXT *context);
> tduffy> +extern u32 dapl_get_consumer_context(DAT_HANDLE handle,
> tduffy> + union dat_context
> *context);
> tduffy>
> tduffy> extern u32 dapl_get_handle_type(DAT_HANDLE handle,
> tduffy> enum dat_handle_type *type);
> tduffy> Index: linux-kernel/dat/dat.h
> tduffy>
> ===================================================================
> tduffy> --- linux-kernel/dat/dat.h (revision 2506)
> tduffy> +++ linux-kernel/dat/dat.h (working copy)
> tduffy> @@ -361,14 +361,14 @@ typedef enum {
> tduffy> TRUE = 1
> tduffy> } boolean_t;
> tduffy>
> tduffy> -typedef union dat_context {
> tduffy> +union dat_context {
> tduffy> void *as_ptr;
> tduffy> u64 as_64;
> tduffy> unsigned long long as_index;
> tduffy> -} DAT_CONTEXT;
> tduffy> +};
> tduffy>
> tduffy> -typedef DAT_CONTEXT DAT_DTO_COOKIE;
> tduffy> -typedef DAT_CONTEXT DAT_RMR_COOKIE;
> tduffy> +typedef union dat_context DAT_DTO_COOKIE;
> tduffy> +typedef union dat_context DAT_RMR_COOKIE;
> tduffy>
> tduffy> enum dat_completion_flags {
> tduffy> /* Completes with notification
> */
> tduffy> @@ -920,13 +920,6 @@ struct dat_upcall_object {
> tduffy> DAT_UPCALL_FUNC upcall_func;
> tduffy> };
> tduffy>
> tduffy> -/* Define NULL upcall */
> tduffy> -
> tduffy> -#define DAT_UPCALL_NULL \
> tduffy> - ((struct dat_upcall_object) { (void *) NULL,
> (DAT_UPCALL_FUNC) NULL })
> tduffy> -
> tduffy> -#define DAT_UPCALL_SAME ((struct
> dat_upcall_object *) NULL)
> tduffy> -
> tduffy> /* Provider/registration info */
> tduffy>
> tduffy> struct dat_provider_info {
> tduffy> @@ -1098,9 +1091,9 @@ typedef u32 (*DAT_IA_QUERY_FUNC)(DAT_IA_
> tduffy> struct dat_ia_attr *,
> tduffy> struct dat_provider_attr *);
> tduffy>
> tduffy> -typedef u32
> (*DAT_SET_CONSUMER_CONTEXT_FUNC)(DAT_HANDLE, DAT_CONTEXT);
> tduffy> +typedef u32
> (*DAT_SET_CONSUMER_CONTEXT_FUNC)(DAT_HANDLE, union dat_context);
> tduffy>
> tduffy> -typedef u32
> (*DAT_GET_CONSUMER_CONTEXT_FUNC)(DAT_HANDLE, DAT_CONTEXT *);
> tduffy> +typedef u32
> (*DAT_GET_CONSUMER_CONTEXT_FUNC)(DAT_HANDLE, union dat_context *);
> tduffy>
> tduffy> typedef u32 (*DAT_GET_HANDLE_TYPE_FUNC)(DAT_HANDLE,
> enum dat_handle_type *);
> tduffy>
> tduffy> @@ -1387,14 +1380,14 @@ extern u32
> dat_registry_list_providers(i
> tduffy> DAT_HANDLE_TO_PROVIDER(handle)->func(handle,
> ##__VA_ARGS__)
> tduffy>
> tduffy> static inline u32 dat_set_consumer_context(DAT_HANDLE handle,
> tduffy> - DAT_CONTEXT context)
> tduffy> + union
> dat_context context)
> tduffy> {
> tduffy> return
> DAT_CALL_PROVIDER_FUNC(set_consumer_context_func, handle,
> tduffy> context);
> tduffy> }
> tduffy>
> tduffy> static inline u32 dat_get_consumer_context(DAT_HANDLE handle,
> tduffy> - DAT_CONTEXT *context)
> tduffy> + union
> dat_context *context)
> tduffy> {
> tduffy> return
> DAT_CALL_PROVIDER_FUNC(get_consumer_context_func, handle,
> tduffy> context);
> tduffy>
> _______________________________________________
> openib-general mailing list
> openib-general at openib.org
> https://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
>
> To unsubscribe, please visit
> https://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
>
- Previous message: [openib-general] RE: [PATCH][kdapl] replace spin_lock with spin_lock_irqsave in kd apltest
- Next message: [openib-general] Re: [PATCH] kDAPL: remove typedef DAT_CONTEX T
-
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the openib-general mailing list